mayan queen's tomb

topic posted Thu, December 7, 2006 - 12:09 PM by  cre8rix
thought i'd try to liven things up in here. you all may have heard of this already, but it seems to have surfaced again, so i thought i'd post it (if you search, most other articles downplay or don't mention at all the woman's high status...)



Maya queen's tomb found in Guatemala
Woman may have led a city 1,200 years ago

AP / Courtesy of K'ante'el Alliance
Graduate student David Lee works on a royal burial site in the Laguna del Tiger National Park in Guatemala. ENCARTA


‘When you actually come face-to-face with human beings, it’s a deeply sacred moment for all of us.’


— David Freidel
Southern Methodist University
By Jamie Stengle

Updated: 1:56 p.m. ET May 6, 2004
DALLAS - While excavating an ancient royal palace deep in the Guatemalan rain forest, archaeologists made a rare discovery — the 1,200-year-old tomb and skeleton of a Maya queen.

Archaeologists announced the find Thursday, and said the woman appears to have been a powerful leader of a city that may have been home to tens of thousands of people at its peak. They found her bones on a raised platform, with evidence of riches scattered around her body.

“We find clues of people’s existence in the past all the time, from the garbage they left or the buildings they built. ... But when you actually come face-to-face with human beings, it’s a deeply sacred moment for all of us,” said David Freidel, an anthropology professor at Southern Methodist University, which sponsored a team of 20 archaeologists excavating the site.


Kept secret for months
The discovery in the ancient Mayan city of Waka’ in northwestern Guatemala was made in February but was not made public until Thursday.

Word of the find comes two days after a Vanderbilt University archaeologist, whose work is supported by the National Geographic Society, publicly described excavation of a little-known Guatamalan site called Cival, which housed as many as 10,000 people at its peak some 2,000 years ago.

Stephen Houston, a Brigham Young University professor specializing in Maya archaeology and writing who was not involved in the project, called the tomb discovery significant.

“We haven’t found to date many tombs of Maya queens,” he said.

Discovered in park
The tomb is the first discovered at Laguna del Tigre, Guatemala’s largest national park, where SMU began its excavation project in 2002.

The queen’s skull and leg bones were missing, probably removed sometime after the body had decomposed to be used as relics. Other than that, the tomb — measuring 11 feet long by 4 feet wide by 6 feet high (3.3 by 1.2 by 2 meters) — was untouched.

The queen is thought to have been 30 to 45 when she died, but archaeologists have uncovered no clues as to her name, dynasty or cause of death.

Freidel, who leads the excavation team with archaeologist Hector Escobedo of Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, said the power the queen held is evident in the 1,600 artifacts found in the tomb — especially the remains of a plated helmet.

Twenty-two jade plaques, each about 2 inches (5 centimeters) square, appear to have been part of the helmet. Archaeologists also found a 4-inch-long (10-centimeter-long) jade carving depicting the dead of a deity in profile — a type of jewel worn by kings and queens, Freidel said.

Stingray spines found in the tomb were usually used as bloodletting implements — males pierced their genitals in ceremonies that offered their blood to the gods, while women generally placed the spines in their tongues. The ones found in the tomb were placed on the queen’s pelvis, Freidel said.

“She’s being represented as both male and female, in my view,” Freidel said.

City abandoned a millennium ago
Research suggests that Waka’ — called El Peru on present-day maps — was inhabited as early as 500 B.C., but reached its peak between A.D. 400 and A.D. 800. The city was abandoned in the late 800s to 900s.

Freidel’s project is working with the Guatemala government and conservation groups to try to protect 230,000 acres of the Laguna del Tigre.

Last year, 100,000 acres of the park were burned as impoverished villagers cleared rain forest for illegal cattle ranching and logging. Freidel says the deforestation threatens habitat for several endangered species, including the scarlet macaw, as well as the area’s archaeological resources.
posted by:
cre8rix
  • Re: mayan queen's tomb

    Fri, December 8, 2006 - 1:21 PM
    That is a very interesting post.

    Am I just ignorant (quite possible), or is this the first documentation of a Mayan queen wielding real power? Was she simply a force of nature, regardless of the patriarchy around her? Did she, through sheer force of will, carve out her own niche, ala Queen Hatshepsut of 18th Dynasty Egypt?

    Not that we'll ever be able to know. Just wondering...
    • Re: mayan queen's tomb

      Sat, December 9, 2006 - 9:41 AM
      no, i think it's the first documentation. and seemingly one of the only, if my google search was accurate. perhaps she carved out her niche like a force of nature. likely though, our understanding of their ways and culture (along with many others) is limited b/c our own early archaeologists were looking through a patriarchal lens. it's hard to understand what you've forgotten to fathom.
      • Re: mayan queen's tomb

        Mon, December 11, 2006 - 4:33 PM
        <<...likely though, our understanding of their ways and culture (along with many others) is limited b/c our own early archaeologists were looking through a patriarchal lens. it's hard to understand what you've forgotten to fathom.>>

        Hear hear. And well put. I would add that not only patriarcal paradigms were pre-supposed, but also that wonderful Euro-centric worldview that we've all come to love so much. People mistakenly thought that physical evolution and cultural evolution were both the natural state of affairs, i.e., that the "latest" societies were the most advanced. I'd like to see your average American or even Brit of today try and make a go at the Mayan calendar...
        • Re: mayan queen's tomb

          Mon, September 10, 2007 - 8:22 PM
          "I'd like to see your average American or even Brit of today try and make a go at the Mayan calendar."

          The Mayan calender was not created by average Mayans. The average Mayan grew corn, and didn't even know the calender existed.

          It was created through thousands of years of observation by exceptional minds within the priesthood.

          The average mayan couldn't write, or even have a concept of what writing was.
  • Re: mayan queen's tomb

    Wed, April 11, 2007 - 8:16 PM
    When that happened, the good lady who happened to be Queen was Enlivened,
    So what was told to you was TRUE... from a certain point of view.
    A certain point of view? You Say...
    We are going to find that many of the truths we cling to
    depend greatly on our own point of view.
    She was a good friend....